Construction Worker Injury Case

Orlando Construction Worker Injury Lawsuit Verdicts & Settlements

Construction Worker Injury Case – The Umansky Law Firm took the case of a young father who was a construction worker and was injured while on the job. The client’s injury was sustained while constructing a new home in an up and coming subdivision. After an investigation, the lawyers at the Umansky Law Firm determined that the construction company had failed to install a barricade on the second floor of the new home to keep the workers safe. Due to this negligence, the client fell and sustained severe injuries. The client fractured his leg and had to undergo two surgeries due to the accident. As a result of the operations, the client — the family’s primary wage earner — missed several months of work. The Umansky Law Firm demanded that the named defendants take responsibility for their negligence, but they refused. The lawyers have filed suit and are vigorously pursuing a claim against their $2,000,000 insurance coverage.

Workplace accidents can be some of the most damaging depending on your line of work. One would assume that their employers would willingly provide compensation when you suffer an injury while performing work duties, but that isn’t always the case. Oftentimes, corporations deny workers’ compensation benefits so that they won’t have to accept responsibility for the incident, but experienced lawyers are standing by to provide you with zealous legal representation.

Worker’s compensation benefits are in place so that employees won’t have to sue their employer when they sustain a workplace injury; however, when business owners deny legitimate workers’ compensation claims, you have the right to pursue legal action. The Orlando work injury lawyers at The Umansky Law Firm can help you receive just compensation by:

  • Ensuring that you file the correct paperwork
  • Meeting strict submission deadlines
  • Gathering evidence on your behalf
  • Drafting a settlement agreement
  • Preparing you for a hearing (if necessary)
  • Representing you at trial (if necessary)

To view more accident injury cases, visit The Umansky Law Firm’s verdicts & settlements page. To speak with an Orlando work injury lawyer, contact us today at 407-228-3838 for a free case evaluation.

Every case is unique and results will vary based on the facts of an individual case. No case results can be guaranteed. These are just a sample of the cases we have settled, tried or currently litigating. Each case has its own set of circumstances and results are so different depending on so many factors it is hard to predict what your case is truly worth until a full investigation is done.

Recent Criminal
Case Results

Grand Theft ($300-$5000)

Nolle Prosequi-Case Dropped

CT-Driving Under the Influence Car (M1)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

CT- Driving under the influence car

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Grand Theft Third Degree

Adjudicated Guilty; One day jail/one day time serve; Restitution fees; Court Cost

Petit Theft < 300

We negotiated an agreement that entailed the State dropping the charge after our client completed a Pre-Trial Diversion Program. The Charge was dropped via a Nolle Prosequi.

Unlawful Speeding

Withhold of Adjudication; No points on license; Paid fine and clerk cost; 8 hour aggressive driver class; 90 days to satisfy fine and class

Shoot/Throw Missile Into Dwell/Struct/Veh; Child Abuse; Criminal Mischief; Battery (Domestic Violence)

No Information Notice - Charges Dropped

Attach Tag/Lic Plate To Unassigned Vehicle (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

DUI with Minor In Car or BAL of .20 or Higher

Pled No Contest, 1 Year Probation, 10 day Car Impound, Community Service

Motion to Modify Probation

Motion Granted in 48 hours

Petit Theft

Adjudication Withheld, 4 Months probation, Costs/Fines, Impulse Control Class

Petit Theft of $100 or MORE (M1)

Nolle Prosequi

Refuse To Submit To DUI Test (M1)

Case Dropped

Battery on Law Enforcement Officer (F3); Disorderly Conduct (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped


Charges Dropped

Scheme to Defraud(F3); Grand Theft(F3)

Motion to Terminate Probation Granted

Unlawful Speed


Failed to Yield at Intersection

Not Guilty

Leave Scene Of A Crash W/Property Damage (M2)

Case Dropped

Motion to Modify and Impose a Withhold of Adjudication


Attempted Burglary of a Conveyance

Charges dropped

Possession of Cannabis (less than 20 grams)

Charges dropped


Reduced to reckless driving

Possession of Alcohol Under the Age of 21

Charges dropped

Driving Under the Influence

Reduced to Reckless Driving

Violation of Probation

Case Dismissed

More Cases

Recent Personal
Injury Settlements


Scooter Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Government Liability Case


Back Injury

More Settlements