I hear that sometimes some of these entrapment to meet a minor cases in Florida involved a fantasy defense and that the clients don't really want to engage in sex with a minor, but they like the fantasy of it, or better yet not the fantasy of a minor, they believe that people on the internet are fantasizing and playacting and play rolling, or creation of fake identities in order to engage sexual fantasies, but are not in fact predators looking for minor children.


That is correct and more and more, as I talk to people that find themselves cut off in these things, basically a common threat is that they talk about internet dating, and they talk about how all of that involves some level of fantasy, or make believe. And basically, if you ask probably most people that are involved in online dating, even so called legitimate online dating, you'll find a consensus that they believe that the people who are on the site to make stuff up about themselves.


Wow, don't you think someone's guilty if they are fantasizing about the sex with minor, that they should be guilty of the crime anyway?


Well, that doesn't fit the case law. I mean, the statute is actually not a crime to fantasize about the minor, but it's certainly distasteful.


I know it's tough, I mean there is a mentality out there that's against these crimes and as well as we do want to make sure that our minors are protected. It's distasteful that people would actually engage in that behavior with a real minor, but of course in these cases from what I understand they're not minors and there is a lot of fantasy and play role going on, and that's not a crime in the State of Florida, as disgusting or distasteful that may sound.


The other thing I do want to say is that there are other defenses that we haven't addressed in this interview that are maybe applicable to other specific cases.

Continue to Part 15 >>

Recent Criminal
Case Results

Grand Theft ($300-$5000)

Nolle Prosequi-Case Dropped

CT-Driving Under the Influence Car (M1)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

CT- Driving under the influence car

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Grand Theft Third Degree

Adjudicated Guilty; One day jail/one day time serve; Restitution fees; Court Cost

Petit Theft < 300

We negotiated an agreement that entailed the State dropping the charge after our client completed a Pre-Trial Diversion Program. The Charge was dropped via a Nolle Prosequi.

Unlawful Speeding

Withhold of Adjudication; No points on license; Paid fine and clerk cost; 8 hour aggressive driver class; 90 days to satisfy fine and class

Shoot/Throw Missile Into Dwell/Struct/Veh; Child Abuse; Criminal Mischief; Battery (Domestic Violence)

No Information Notice - Charges Dropped

Attach Tag/Lic Plate To Unassigned Vehicle (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

DUI with Minor In Car or BAL of .20 or Higher

Pled No Contest, 1 Year Probation, 10 day Car Impound, Community Service

Motion to Modify Probation

Motion Granted in 48 hours

Petit Theft

Adjudication Withheld, 4 Months probation, Costs/Fines, Impulse Control Class

Petit Theft of $100 or MORE (M1)

Nolle Prosequi

Refuse To Submit To DUI Test (M1)

Case Dropped

Battery on Law Enforcement Officer (F3); Disorderly Conduct (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped


Charges Dropped

Scheme to Defraud(F3); Grand Theft(F3)

Motion to Terminate Probation Granted

Unlawful Speed


Failed to Yield at Intersection

Not Guilty

Leave Scene Of A Crash W/Property Damage (M2)

Case Dropped

Motion to Modify and Impose a Withhold of Adjudication


Attempted Burglary of a Conveyance

Charges dropped

Possession of Cannabis (less than 20 grams)

Charges dropped


Reduced to reckless driving

Possession of Alcohol Under the Age of 21

Charges dropped

Driving Under the Influence

Reduced to Reckless Driving

Violation of Probation

Case Dismissed

More Cases

Recent Personal
Injury Settlements


Scooter Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Government Liability Case


Back Injury

More Settlements