Cross Examination (Challenging an Officer’s Testimony in Court)

empty courtroom law scale

Going to court for any reason can be intimidating. Knowing that a police officer will also be present to testify against you can be even more nerve-wracking. The officer’s testimony is “evidence” in court. But like any other witness, your criminal defense attorney will cross-examine the officer and work to show that the testimony is inaccurate.

The Police Report

Police officers write their reports to ensure that an arrest, charge or other action was done correctly, and to provide a prosecutor with a series of facts from the recorded incident. Reports are written based on what the officer saw, recorded or experienced at the time of the incident, and may not have a complete set of facts. (This is frequently seen in certain types of car accidents, where it “looks like” something happened a certain way.) A police officer’s testimony may be taken as a complete report, when, in fact, it may not be complete.

Once an officer is called to testify, your attorney will ask specific questions of the police officer, requesting details of the case, as well as pointing out any inconsistencies in testimony or the police report.

Testifying And Cross Examination

Police officers are also trained in court testimony, and may follow a particular “script” during trial. A defense attorney skilled in cross-examination will ask the officer pointed questions. Section 90.608(2), Florida Statutes provides that a witness’s credibility can be challenged by demonstrating that the witness is, indeed, biased.

A prime example involves traffic ticket cases. The state calls on the on-duty police officer to demonstrate why he or she issued you the ticket. After the officer’s testimony, your attorney has the opportunity to ask additional questions. Cross examination allows the defense to raise relevant questions about the government’s case against you, and introduce doubt into the case.

woman given ticket by law officer

For instance, in a traffic case, your attorney may ask about where the officer was positioned when he or she observed you committing a traffic violation. If a radar device was used to determine your speed, asking about the device’s calibration or maintenance may be asked to establish whether it was functioning properly. Was the officer paying attention to something else when you allegedly committed this offense, such as his radio or phone?

Preparing For Court

Understand that the government is required to prove that you committed the offense you have been charged with. Bringing in a police officer is one of the strongest defenses they have available. Asking the questions that discredit or otherwise invalidate the police officer’s testimony is your attorney’s job to adequately defend you. Cross-examination is a very complex part of trial, and your attorney will be ready.  


A defense attorney will work with you to establish the facts of the case, and prepare for your court date. Depending on the type of case, you can research laws in the county where your court date is to familiarize yourself with the upcoming case. .

Headed To Trial? Call The Lawman

Representing yourself in court is never a good idea. You need someone on your side who will defend your rights and ensure you get a fair trial. The Orlando defense lawyers with The Umansky Law Firm have over 100 years of combined criminal law experience to put to use for you. Contact us to discuss your case and how we can help. Call (407) 228-3838 and speak directly with one of our personal injury attorneys, or use our online contact form.  

Recent Criminal
Case Results

Burglary of Dwelling; Petit Theft

Withhold with 6 months probation and impulse control; adjudication withheld

Grand Theft ($300-$5000)

Nolle Prosequi-Case Dropped

CT-Driving Under the Influence Car (M1)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

CT- Driving under the influence car

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Grand Theft Third Degree

Adjudicated Guilty; One day jail/one day time serve; Restitution fees; Court Cost

Petit Theft < 300

We negotiated an agreement that entailed the State dropping the charge after our client completed a Pre-Trial Diversion Program. The Charge was dropped via a Nolle Prosequi.

Unlawful Speeding

Withhold of Adjudication; No points on license; Paid fine and clerk cost; 8 hour aggressive driver class; 90 days to satisfy fine and class

Shoot/Throw Missile Into Dwell/Struct/Veh; Child Abuse; Criminal Mischief; Battery (Domestic Violence)

No Information Notice - Charges Dropped

Attach Tag/Lic Plate To Unassigned Vehicle (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

DUI with Minor In Car or BAL of .20 or Higher

Pled No Contest, 1 Year Probation, 10 day Car Impound, Community Service

Motion to Modify Probation

Motion Granted in 48 hours

Petit Theft

Adjudication Withheld, 4 Months probation, Costs/Fines, Impulse Control Class

Petit Theft of $100 or MORE (M1)

Nolle Prosequi

Refuse To Submit To DUI Test (M1)

Case Dropped

Battery on Law Enforcement Officer (F3); Disorderly Conduct (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped


Charges Dropped

Scheme to Defraud(F3); Grand Theft(F3)

Motion to Terminate Probation Granted

Unlawful Speed


Failed to Yield at Intersection

Not Guilty

Leave Scene Of A Crash W/Property Damage (M2)

Case Dropped

Motion to Modify and Impose a Withhold of Adjudication


Attempted Burglary of a Conveyance

Charges dropped

Possession of Cannabis (less than 20 grams)

Charges dropped


Reduced to reckless driving

Possession of Alcohol Under the Age of 21

Charges dropped

Driving Under the Influence

Reduced to Reckless Driving

Violation of Probation

Case Dismissed

More Cases

Recent Personal
Injury Settlements


Sexual Assault Victim


Car Accident


Motorcycle Accident


Trip and Fall


Car Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Scooter Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Government Liability Case


Back Injury

More Settlements