ACLU Challenges Miami Sex Offender Law As Unconstitutional

ACLU says sex offender restriction keeps people from living in stable homes

Miami-Dade County’s controversial sex offender law forbidding registered sex offenders from living near places where children may congregate is coming under fire. According to the Miami Herald, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is challenging the constitutionality of the law in court. The ACLU says the law denies people the right to find stable housing and essentially forces many people into homelessness and a precarious existence. The housing restriction has made international headlines after images of homeless people appeared worldwide being shuttled from one place to another.

Housing restriction

The housing restriction forbids registered sex offenders from residing within 2,500 feet of a school, park, bus stop, or other place where children are likely to gather. The previous limit was 1,000 feet, but was raised after images of homeless offenders residing under the Julia Tuttle Causeway brought attention to the city’s homeless problem.

The restriction also means that sex offenders often have to find new accommodation when a school, park, or similar place opens up near to where they live. For example, the people who resided under the Julia Tuttle Causeway later were forced to move to Shorecrest. However, when a nearby vacant lot was turned into a park the homeless people were forced to move again. They now reside near railway tracks, largely without electricity or shelter.

Rights violated

While the housing restrictions are designed to increase public safety, the ACLU says they go too far. They have launched a lawsuit alleging that the restrictions violate the constitutional rights of offenders by denying them the right to live in vast swaths of the city.

The ACLU also points out that the restrictions may not actually increase public safety as they are designed. By denying offenders the ability to find affordable housing, many of them also have difficulty getting back on their feet and reintegrating into society, thus increasing the likelihood of recidivism.

Criminal defense

As the above story shows, being charged and convicted for a criminal offense carries consequences that often go well beyond prison time and a criminal record. While every criminal offense is a matter to be taken seriously, sex crimes are notorious for the damage they can cause to a person’s reputation and quality of life.

Anybody who has been charged with a criminal offense should contact a criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. An experienced attorney will fight against a criminal charge so that clients will have the help they need to not only hopefully avoid a harsh sentence, but to also keep their reputations intact.

Resource Links Business Directory

Recent Criminal
Case Results

Grand Theft ($300-$5000)

Nolle Prosequi-Case Dropped

CT-Driving Under the Influence Car (M1)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

CT- Driving under the influence car

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Grand Theft Third Degree

Adjudicated Guilty; One day jail/one day time serve; Restitution fees; Court Cost

Petit Theft < 300

We negotiated an agreement that entailed the State dropping the charge after our client completed a Pre-Trial Diversion Program. The Charge was dropped via a Nolle Prosequi.

Unlawful Speeding

Withhold of Adjudication; No points on license; Paid fine and clerk cost; 8 hour aggressive driver class; 90 days to satisfy fine and class

Shoot/Throw Missile Into Dwell/Struct/Veh; Child Abuse; Criminal Mischief; Battery (Domestic Violence)

No Information Notice - Charges Dropped

Attach Tag/Lic Plate To Unassigned Vehicle (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

DUI with Minor In Car or BAL of .20 or Higher

Pled No Contest, 1 Year Probation, 10 day Car Impound, Community Service

Motion to Modify Probation

Motion Granted in 48 hours

Petit Theft

Adjudication Withheld, 4 Months probation, Costs/Fines, Impulse Control Class

Petit Theft of $100 or MORE (M1)

Nolle Prosequi

Refuse To Submit To DUI Test (M1)

Case Dropped

Battery on Law Enforcement Officer (F3); Disorderly Conduct (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped


Charges Dropped

Scheme to Defraud(F3); Grand Theft(F3)

Motion to Terminate Probation Granted

Unlawful Speed


Failed to Yield at Intersection

Not Guilty

Leave Scene Of A Crash W/Property Damage (M2)

Case Dropped

Motion to Modify and Impose a Withhold of Adjudication


Attempted Burglary of a Conveyance

Charges dropped

Possession of Cannabis (less than 20 grams)

Charges dropped


Reduced to reckless driving

Possession of Alcohol Under the Age of 21

Charges dropped

Driving Under the Influence

Reduced to Reckless Driving

Violation of Probation

Case Dismissed

More Cases

Recent Personal
Injury Settlements


Scooter Accident


Car Accident


Car Accident


Government Liability Case


Back Injury

More Settlements