As most Florida residents already know, possessing, distributing, and transmitting child pornography are all illegal in this state. Recently, as reported by NorthEscambia.com, a Pensacola man was arrested and charged with 20 counts of transmitting child pornography. Police discovered that the 23-year-old man had downloaded sexually explicit videos of underage minors onto his computer and then proceeded to forward those videos to others. The North Florida Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, with the assistance of included the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Homeland Security, was able to identify the man by tracing his internet IP. The charges are serious-transmitting child pornography is a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

What does "transmit" mean?

The recent decision of Biller v. State by the District Court of Appeals in Florida recently decided a case that focused on what the word "transmit" means or does not mean. The defendant in that case had been charged and pleaded guilty to transmitting child pornography by use of an electronic device. But he argued at the time that the charges should have been dismissed because there was no evidence that he had "transmitted" anything. The defendant had used a peer-to-peer network where he downloaded the pornographic images to his computer and permitted other network users to access his files. Police investigators, subscribing to the same network, went to the defendant's computer files, accessed the images, and then charged him with the crime of transmitting child pornography.

The statute defined "transmit" as an "act of sending and causing to be delivered any image, information, or data from one or more persons or places to one or more other persons or places over or through any medium, including the Internet, by use of any electronic equipment or device." The question the court faced was whether the defendant had "sent" anything when he merely allowed others to access his files. The court noted that the defendant did not affirmatively use a function of his computer, and indeed did not know who might access the file. He simply kept them in a computer file knowing that other network members might access them. The court concluded that the word "send" in this context could have several definitions, but when a criminal statute is susceptible of more than one construction, the court is obliged to construe that statute in the light most favorable to the defendant-not the state. The court then reversed the conviction.

Charges involving the possession, distribution, or transmission of child pornography have serious consequences, and anyone who is facing such charges should seek the representation of an experience Florida criminal attorney.

Please contact one of our Orlando Sex crime lawyers today for a free case review 407-228-3838.

Recent Criminal
Case Results

Grand Theft ($300-$5000)

Nolle Prosequi-Case Dropped

CT-Driving Under the Influence Car (M1)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

CT- Driving under the influence car

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Grand Theft Third Degree

Adjudicated Guilty; One day jail/one day time serve; Restitution fees; Court Cost

Petit Theft < 300

We negotiated an agreement that entailed the State dropping the charge after our client completed a Pre-Trial Diversion Program. The Charge was dropped via a Nolle Prosequi.

Unlawful Speeding

Withhold of Adjudication; No points on license; Paid fine and clerk cost; 8 hour aggressive driver class; 90 days to satisfy fine and class

Shoot/Throw Missile Into Dwell/Struct/Veh; Child Abuse; Criminal Mischief; Battery (Domestic Violence)

No Information Notice - Charges Dropped

Attach Tag/Lic Plate To Unassigned Vehicle (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

DUI with Minor In Car or BAL of .20 or Higher

Pled No Contest, 1 Year Probation, 10 day Car Impound, Community Service

Motion to Modify Probation

Motion Granted in 48 hours

Petit Theft

Adjudication Withheld, 4 Months probation, Costs/Fines, Impulse Control Class

Petit Theft of $100 or MORE (M1)

Nolle Prosequi

Refuse To Submit To DUI Test (M1)

Case Dropped

Battery on Law Enforcement Officer (F3); Disorderly Conduct (M2)

Nolle Prosequi - Case Dropped

Battery

Charges Dropped

Scheme to Defraud(F3); Grand Theft(F3)

Motion to Terminate Probation Granted

Unlawful Speed

Dismissed

Failed to Yield at Intersection

Not Guilty

Leave Scene Of A Crash W/Property Damage (M2)

Case Dropped

Motion to Modify and Impose a Withhold of Adjudication

Granted

Attempted Burglary of a Conveyance

Charges dropped

Possession of Cannabis (less than 20 grams)

Charges dropped

VOP for DUI

Reduced to reckless driving

Possession of Alcohol Under the Age of 21

Charges dropped

Driving Under the Influence

Reduced to Reckless Driving

Violation of Probation

Case Dismissed

More Cases

Recent Personal
Injury Settlements

$125,000

Scooter Accident

$275,000

Car Accident

$100,000

Car Accident

$300,000

Government Liability Case

$100,000

Back Injury

More Settlements